3. Results
Desk 1 illustrates this new frequency of each of dangers of the research, with respect to the standard of severity found. At exactly the same time, it reveals the latest reviews between the withdrawals away from boys and girls with the more dangers. Complete, the participants who displayed nothing wrong varied ranging from % that has no troubles that have tricky Internet sites explore and up so you’re able to 83.4% that has no troubles having on the internet brushing. I remember that all of the modest and significant difficulties varied ranging from cuatro% to have sexting and you will 17% to own tricky Web sites fool around with. 9% out-of moderate/really serious difficulties as well as in cyberbullying, it reached thirteen.7%. The latest frequencies based in the some other levels of troubles have been usually deeper for women compared to guys.
Desk step 1
Prevalence of each of the threats due to the fact a purpose of brand new severity of your problem into full sample as well as sex.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.
In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Table 2 ).
Table 2
Distinctions since the a purpose of informative stage (1st–2nd, 3rd–last grades from CSE and Blog post-supplementary Degree) from the threats (letter = 3212, except for happening out-of cyber matchmaking punishment having letter = 1061).
Note: Yards = arithmetic indicate; SD = practical departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.
Desk step 3 reveals the brand new correlations amongst the some dangers. Them got self-confident and you will extreme correlations with each other, with the relationship ranging from cyberbullying victimization and you can cyber 
relationship victimization condition out. Internet sites risks having an intimate component (on the web brushing and you can sexting) was basically very synchronised. Overall, the fresh new correlations were highest to have boys in the most common of your own risks, except for the new dating between cyber relationships victimization and grooming and you may between tricky Internet sites explore and you may cyberbullying victimization, on the internet grooming and sexting.
Table step 3
Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.
Dining table cuatro gift ideas this new comorbidities one of several some Internet sites risks associated to help you private communications (cyberbullying victimization, cyber matchmaking abuse victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Precisely the participants just who completed all the items in regards to the threats related in order to victimization (letter = 1109) had been noticed (i.age., getting rid of about studies individuals who didn’t come with spouse). Of your kept participants, sixty.7% showed at least one of the analysed dangers (letter = 674). The danger for the highest private incidence are cyberbullying victimization (%), with on the web brushing. The most common a few-risk combinations was indeed cyberbullying victimization-on the internet brushing and cyberbullying-sexting. I highlight the 3-exposure combination of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. Fundamentally, 5.49% of one’s victimized adolescents displayed every risks conjointly.