The results are expressed as means and standard deviations, unless stated otherwise. Between-group differences in subject characteristics were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using https://lovingwomen.org/heise-und-sexy-spanische-frauen/ Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure if a significant F test was obtained. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust body composition results for comparison across ethnic groups. Before carrying out the ANCOVA, similarity of regression slopes among the ethnic groups was verified by examining the significance of the interaction between the covariate(s) and the group variable. Relationships between body composition measurements and age were investigated by multiple regression analysis controlling for independent variables such as height and weight. Potential interaction terms and non-linear relationships were examined for selected variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are presented for bivariate linear relationships with age and partial correlation coefficients where adjustment is made for weight and height. Data were analysed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results with P < 0·05>
Class and you can entire-system composition
Body constitution attributes of the victims are summarised by the sex and you will ethnicity into the Dining table dos. Eu dudes had been young, tall together with all the way down FM and you will percentage of BF than the alternatives about almost every other three groups. Eu female was indeed young than Far eastern Indian women, and you can had been high along with down FM and portion of BF than simply its alternatives regarding almost every other around three groups. The Asian Indian guys had leg weight and you will BMC however, high percentage of BF versus Western european, Maori and you may Pacific men. The newest Far-eastern Indian feminine in addition to met with the high percentage of BF and reasonable BMC of your own four cultural communities, while you are their body pounds is actually lower than Maori and you will Pacific women rather than significantly distinct from the brand new Eu women. Just after adjustment to have decades, height and pounds, Western Indians had the large FM, reduced weight-totally free mass and you will lower BMC of one’s five ethnic organizations, while Pacific met with the low FM and you can higher pounds-100 % free size, for folks, and the higher BMC for men (Table 3).
Dating between Bmi and you may percentage of extra fat
Curvilinear relationships between the percentage of BF and BMI for each ethnic group were linearised by logarithmically transforming BMI (Fig. 1)parison of regression equations of the percentage of BF on the logarithm of BMI with age as a covariate and with sex and ethnicity as group variables indicated significant heterogeneity in the slopes of the male and female equations (P < 0·0001).>
Fig. 1 Relationship between the percentage of body fat (BF) and BMI of European (?), Maori (0), Pacific Island (^) and Asian Indian (?) (a) men and (b) women. The linear regressions are: percentage of BF = 117·7 log10(BMI) ? 144·2 (standard error of estimate (SEE) = 5·2 %, r 2 0·61, n 124) for European men (-); percentage of BF = 101·3 log10(BMI) ? 122·0 (SEE = 4·6 %, r 2 0·74, n 109) for Maori men (- – -); percentage of BF = 93·6 log10(BMI) ? 113·6 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·68, n 104) for Pacific Island men (·····); percentage of BF = 78·6 log10(BMI) ? 79·4 (SEE = 5·0 %, r 2 0·52, n 117) for Asian Indian men (-·-·); percentage of BF = 103·5 log10(BMI) ? 109·7 (SEE = 4·8 %, r 2 0·72, n 186) for European women (-); percentage of BF = 74·8 log10(BMI) ? 70·3 (SEE = 3·9 %, r 2 0·72, n 90) for Maori women (—); percentage of BF = 65·2 log10(BMI) ? 57·8 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·65, n 97) for Pacific Island women (·····); percentage of BF = 71·0 log10(BMI) ? 57·7 (SEE = 4·4 %, r 2 0·60, n 107) for Asian Indian women (-·-·).